Assessment of Growth and Adaptation Rate of Mung Beans (vigna radiata) Planted in Different Planting Periods in Abagana, South Eastern Nigeria

Authors

  • Chukwura Nnabike Francis National Biotechnology Development Agency, Abuja
  • Cletus Onyemeforo Ezidi Bioresources Development Centre, Abagana, Anambra State
  • Abdullahi Mustapha National Biotechnology Development Agency, Abuja
  • Ebelechukwu Christiana Mmuta Bioresources Development Centre, Abagana, Anambra State
  • Chinyere Eucharia Umeocho Bioresources Development Centre, Abagana, Anambra State
  • Rita Ogechukwu Ohakwe Bioresources Development Centre, Abagana, Anambra State

Keywords:

Adaptation rate, mung beans, planting period, growth, agronomic characters

Abstract

Communication in Physical Sciences, 2024, 11(4): 757-766

Authors: Chukwura Nnabike Francis, Cletus Onyemeforo Ezidi, Abdullahi Mustapha, Ebelechukwu Christiana Mmuta, Chinyere Eucharia Umeocho and Rita Ogechukwu Ohakwe

Received: 36 March 2024/Accepted: 30 July 2024

Research was conducted to compare the growth characteristics, adaptation rate and attributes of mung beans (Vigna radiata) planted in different planting periods in Abagana, South Eastern Nigeria. The experiment was carried out at Bioresources Development Centre, Abagana, Anambra State, between February to April, May to July and August to October all in 2021. Mung beans seeds were planted using a planting distance of 30cm by 60cm in each planting period. The mung beans cultivated matured from nine to ten weeks after planting in each planting period and data was collected weekly in some phenotypic characteristics of the crop from the first week to the tenth week after planting. The highest mean values per plant of some agronomic characters collected from the field such as plant height (cm), number of leaves, length of leaves (cm), width of leaves (cm) and number of pods were 17.2cm, 18, 6.0cm, 4.8cm and 20 for those grown between Februaryto April while those grown between  May to July were 35.4cm, 39, 14.6cm, 12.9cm and 37, and those of August to October were 34.6cm, 37, 13.8cm, 13.0cm and 35.There were no significant difference (P>0.05) between the mung beans planted from May to July and those planted from August to October with respect to the above agronomic characters. Significant difference (P<0.05) existed between the mung beans planted from February to April when compared with those of May to July and August to October with respect to the above-mentioned agronomic characters. The result of the data collected from the field which was used as the plant adaptation parameters suggested that the mung beans grown between May to July and August to October had a better adaptation to the planting periods when compared with those grown from February to April 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chankaew, S., Isemura, T., Naito, K., Ogiso-Tanaka, E., Tomooka, N., Somta, P. (2014) TL Mapping for Salt Tolerance and Domestication-Related Traits in Vigna marina Subsp. oblnga, a Halophytic Species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, pp. 691-702.

Dainavizadeh, P., & Mehranzadeh, M. (2013). Effect of seed rate on growth, yield components and yield of mung bean grown under irrigated conditions in the North of Khuzestan.International Journal ofAgriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS), 5, 20, pp. 2359–2365.

Georgis, K. (2010). Environment and natural resources management working paper agriculturally based livelihood systems in dry lands in the context of climate change inventory of adaptation practices and technologies of Ethiopia. Rome: FAO.

Kyriacou, M.C., Rouphael, Y., Di Gioia, F., Kyratzis, A., Serio, F., Renna, M., et al. (2016) Micro-Scale Vegetable Production and the Rise of Microgreens. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 57, pp.103-115.

Nair, R.M., Thavarajah, D., Thavarajah, P., Giri, R.R., Ledesma, D., Yang, R.Y., et al. (2015) Mineral and Phenolic Concentrations of Mungbean [Vignaradiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] Grown in Semi-Arid Tropical India. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 39, pp. 23-32.

Nair, R.M., Yang, R.Y., Easdown, W.J., Thavarajah, D., Thavarajah, P., d’A Hughes, J., et al. (2013) Biofortification of Mungbean (Vignaradiata) as a Whole Food to Enhance Human Health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93, pp. 1805-1813.

Obi I. U. (2002). Statistical method of detecting difference between treatment means and research methodology issues in laboratory and field experiments. AP Express Publishers Limited Nsukka (second edition.

Pataczek, L., Zahir, Z., Ahmad, M., Rani, S., Nair, R.,Schafleitner, R.,Cadisch, G. and Hilger, T. (2018) Beans with Benefits—The Role of Mungbean (Vigna radiate) in a Changing Environment. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, pp. 1577-1600. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2018.97115.

Sehrawat, N., Yadav, M., Bhat, K., Sairam, R. and Jaiwal, P. (2015) Effect of Salinity Stress on Mungbean [Vigna radiata L. Wilczek] during Consecutive Summer and Spring Seasons. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 60, pp. 23-32.

Shi, Z., Yao, Y., Zhu, Y. and Ren, G. (2016) Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Twenty Mung Beans Cultivars in China. The Crop Journal, 4, pp. 398- 406.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-24