Comparative Analyses amongst 3 Hybrid Controllers - MPC-HGAFSA, LQR-HGAFSA and PID-HGAFSA in a Micro Grid Power System Using MAD and RMSE as Measures of Performance Metrics
Keywords:
Comparative Analyses, Hybrid Controllers, Micro Grid Power System, Mean Absolute Deviation and Root Mean Square ErrorAbstract
Communication in Physical Sciences, 2023, 10(1): 155-162
Authors: Godwin Ezikanyi Okey, Yusuf Jibril and Gbenga Abidemi Olarinoye
Received: 21 June 2023/Accepted 09 November 2023
Adverse effects in a power generating system, such as frequency instability, voltage profile degradation, poor power delivery and power outages, are caused by frequency and voltage fluctuations. These fluctuations are caused by load variations and generation losses, which are inevitable in a power-generating system. Power controllers such as model predictive controller (M.P.C.), linear quadratic regulator (L.Q.R.) and proportional integral derivative (P.I.D.); and controller optimizers such as genetic algorithm (G.A.), artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) with their hybrids are often used to mitigate the aforementioned effect. This paper tends to compare the efficiency of each of the three mentioned controllers with the optimizers using mean absolute deviation (MAD) and root mean square error (RMSE) as performance metrics. The hybrid of .A.G.A. and AFSA (HGAFSA) was used to optimize each of the controllers (MPC-HGAFSA, LQR-HGAFSA and PID-HGAFSA) in a micro-grid power system. the M.P.C.- HGAFSA based approach demonstrates an outstanding frequency and voltage control capability when compared with the other two control strategies, while PID-HGAFSA-based strategy is the least performing strategy.
Downloads
References
Anderson, G., Donalek, P., Farmer, R., Hatziargyriou N., Kamwa, I.,Kundur, P.,Martins, N., Paserba, J., Pourbeik, P.,Sanchez-Gasca, J., Schulz, R., Stankovic, A.,Taylor, C. & Vittal, V. (2005): Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20, 4, pp. 1922-1928, , doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857942.
Azad, A., Rocha, A. & Fernandez, E. (2014). Improved binary artificial fish swarm algorithm for the 0–1 multidimensional knapsack problems. Swarm and Evolutionary, 14, pp.66-75,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2013.09.002.
Chatterjee, S. & Laudato, M. (1997): Genetic algorithms in statistics: procedures and applications. Common Statist Simula. 26, 4, pp. 1617-1630.
Lasseter, R. H. & Piagi P., (2001). Micro Grid, a conceptual solution”, in Proc.Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Aachen, Germany, 6, pp. 4285-4290.
Katiraei, F. & Iravani, M. R. (2005). Transients of a Micro-Grid System with Multiple Distributed Energy Resources. International Conference on Power Systems Transients, Montreal, 19-23 June 2005, Paper No. IPST05-080.
Li, M., Huang, X., Liu, H., Liu, B., Wu, Y., Xiong, A. & Dong, T. (2013). Prediction of gas solubility in polymers by back propagation artificial neural network based on self- adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm and chaos theory Fluid Phase Equilibria 356, 25, pp. 11-7
Multiple Distributed Energy Resources. International Conference on Power Systems Transients (IPST’05) in Montreal, Canada, pp. 19-23.
Prabha, K. (1994). Power system stability and control. McGraw-Hill, New York
U.S.A-Canada power system Outage Task Force, (2004): Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and recommendations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal and Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.